You learn a lot when you are out looking for a church. The Bean and I went to yet another one today. This one, unlike many of the others, we were very excited about. It had tagged itself as a "missional" church, and its lingo was straight out of Michael Frost's Shaping of things to Come.
It was a place for broken people, those tired of the mask they feel is needed in many arenas of their lives, in many sectors of society. It was a place that was welcome to those on the outside - whatever all that was supposed to mean. I don't care what anyone else says, it was still church in the modern era. The entire communities' justification for existing was still centered around the preacher's art and the music-dependant "worship." It was still entertainment-driven. The music is playing, the emotions are stirring, and to an outsider (of which for today, I was one), it was still exactly the sort of ritual a football coach takes his team through in the locker-room pep-talk. Got to rally them. Got to hook their emotions - it is the only way to make this successful. Got to play better, sing better, choose the songs better. And then we will arrive at nirvana, the confirmation of which is people walking out afterwards, nodding their heads and saying "that was really great."
Church isn't an event. It isn't something with a time and date that can be put on a bulletin, and predicatmized (sounds like victimized) onto a tight schedule. It is so void of life, of the natural rhythms and movements of the real world, to sit and "behave" for an hour, in a service that roughly still follows the outlines of Roman Senate meetings of the first three centuries: Sit now, stand now, lift praise to the diety now, go through the decisions of the body-politic, bow in reverence to the diety, and the republic it represents. Who are we worshipping anyway? God, or Caesar? We thought we threw him off at the Reformation, but it turns out we've retained more than we like to admit. Perhaps we need a new reformation . . . .
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
this is why I believe missional is not a program but a lifestyle, get the people to live missionally and the church will act missionally.
ReplyDeleteChurches need to come in all forms but the function of each needs to be missional.
true, so then what you're saying is the big, purpose-driven corporate churches can be missional, so long as they are in the midst of a context of purpose-driven, corporate people. I think where the problem with that is many of these churches are trying to live that model in contexts where these sorts of people are much less concentrated. what ends up happenning is a weeding out of those who respond to that sort of church positively, and an alienation of those who do not understand it.
ReplyDelete